I promise not to do this with every review (he says, hoping there will be many more to come…for which there’s no guarantee) but it’s always great to see something nice right off the starting line: https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-62672-025-1
I promise not to do this with every review (he says, hoping there will be many more to come…for which there’s no guarantee) but it’s always great to see something nice right off the starting line: https://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-62672-025-1
We just watched the Netflix series “Losers” (which we learned about through Nick Bertozzi’s (@NickBertozzi) involvement on storyboards) and it was both short and great. If you enjoy good storytelling and don’t mind some sports in the mix you’ll like it.
It’s also not about losers, and I’m sure the creators gave it a misleading title on purpose. The show is more about moving forward after failure—sometimes repeated failure. None of the people featured are winners in the sense of gold-medals or “We’re Number One!” chants. Their stories are more interesting than that. It’s hard to pick favorites, but if you only want to sample a few, try “Judgement,” “Stone Cold,” and “Aliy.”
The reason I’m writing about this is not because I want to start a new career as TV reviewer, but because the show brought to mind my two favorite sporting events I’ve watched, neither of which ended as wins, exactly:
Tigers v. Angels
August 26, 2015
Justin Verlander, after a season that began on the disabled list and proceeded through to some minor league play and a so-so W-L record, started a kind of nothing late season game (the Tigers were a bad 59-66 at that point, the Angels a barely average 64-61) that night, and we were relaxing at the ballpark because night baseball in Detroit is relaxing. But as the game progressed and he kept pitching and kept striking out batters it got exciting. Kat—still pretty new to all this—was confused by all the cheering, since on the face of it the game was getting kind of boring by the time of the 7th inning stretch. Since I’ve been watching since I was a kid and was a particularly superstitious kid at that (in Little League, when things were going well for my team, I ate the exact same Cobb salad…with turkey instead of bacon…before every evening game) I hadn’t pointed out to her that Verlander hadn’t given up any hits and only two walks until she asked.
The Tigers won easily, Verlander completed the game, easily, but it wasn’t a no-hitter in the end. Watching him as he threw one bad pitch that caused him to miss out on this by, literally, an inch, was simultaneously not fun and the very definition of seeing professionalism in action. It was a great night for fans, and we cheered until he came out for an encore.
Well, okay, it’s not like he threw more pitches, but the usually stoic Verlander seemed touched by how much we appreciated the show he’d put on. A win.
Kipchoge v. 2:00:00
May 6, 2016
Publicity stunt? Maybe. Two-plus advertisement for Nike? Probably. But…
We were watching a movie at home on Friday night when I said I was going to stay up a little longer to watch the start of a race (a time trial, really) that would begin at 11:45 local time. Kat thought I was nuts, but after months of training and preparation and secret shoe development, three runners were going to take a shot at running 26.2 miles in under two hours. It wouldn’t be an official world record because of the insertion of fresh pacers every 1.5+ miles (and a pace car throughout) but it would still be an amazing feat if someone managed it.
I’d been following this effort casually, largely via Ed Caesar’s (@edcaesar) great articles about the run-up in Wired, so I wanted to see what this would look like. You know, the first 15 minutes or so.
So we watched. And the ballet of the pacers and the beauty of Eliud Kipchoge’s running kept both of us up for the whole thing. Yeah, we watched the three people run in a short and not-at-all-scenic loop for more than two hours.
And when we weren’t watching Kipchoge look gorgeous every step of the way, we watched some advertorials and listened to some pseudo-science and groaned through some hyperbolic commentary.
(When the announcers said he was only X seconds behind pace now, “so if he can run the next few miles 20 seconds faster he’ll still do it!” I had to laugh. It’s as if they were talking about your average jogger who, approaching the end of their first 5K, starts sprinting to look good for a photo their spouse will post on Instagram. I mean, he was already running a 4:30-something mile…to pick up the pace by even a second or two would be virtually impossible. And that thing where it looked like he was smiling there near the end, the only change in expression he’d showed through most of the run? I don’t think he was happy to be falling behind pace. As he said afterward, “Three laps to go, I felt a little tired in my legs.” You’d grimace too.)
Anyway, you can probably tell by the title above that the two hour barrier didn’t get broken that night. But it was still worth staying up well past our bedtime, and the National Geographic documentary is well worth an hour—only an hour!—of your time. And Eliud Kipchoge is about as far from a loser as I can imagine.
https://youtu.be/V2ZLG-Fij_4
Hi! After a long hiatus from blogging and site updating, we’re back with both…and now at least the site will be responsive. (I’ll try too!) I hope you like it, and can find stuff, and that it works well for all your G.T. Labs and science comics needs. I think it will for mine. Many thanks to my friend Jane for getting me here.
Of course a website refresh isn’t newsworthy at this point in history. It’s not like we’re living in the world of The Americans, where “ARPANET” is invoked like it’s a magical and mysterious thing. Which it is, if you think about it for even a second. (And for the worst cross-over ever, imagine Harry Potter sneaking onto that show and yelling Arpa Net, causing all the mainframe tape drives to spin out of control.) But it’s also mundane and commonplace too.
So what remains that’s magical and mysterious while also being the very definition of mundane and commonplace? Quantum theory! And that’s where the new background image comes in. This is the rendering of Einstein’s clock-in-a-box as it appears in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp (1949). No credit for the artist, but I infer from the text that it was commissioned by Bohr himself, and as a collector, that would be a drawing I’d love to have the original for.
It illustrates a thought experiment he posed to stump Niels Bohr and his fellow quantum theorists in Einstein’s ongoing effort to demonstrate, once and for all, that this quantum stuff was nonsense. The bunk. Just Plain Wrong.
It almost worked.
Bohr had dispatched most of Einstein’s previous objections with relative ease, but this one made him sweat. Here’s how the scene plays out in Suspended in Language, which you can buy right here on this site, or from great booksellers everywhere.
(Sorry/not sorry about the EPR cliffhanger!)
Hey, do you need the perfect* gift? How about a signed copy of Leland Purvis and my NYT Best Seller The Imitation Game, delivered to your doorstep by someone in a great looking uniform?
I’m in town for the MoCCA Arts Festival (signings on both Saturday and Sunday…more details here), and the newspaper of record has welcomed me with this.
I’m going places to promote our book, The Imitation Game: Alan Turing Decoded. Here’s what I know about so far:
Metropolitan West, NYC (right next to the High Line!)
I’ll be signing on both days wherever beautiful books by Abrams ComicArts are sold. The schedule is here, but in brief:Saturday, noon-1pm at the First Second boothSaturday 1-3pm at the Abrams Booth (G235, G 246)Sunday 11am-1pm and 2-4pm, also at Abrams!
This is my alma mater, and I’m amazed to return as a speaker about a comic book. Undergrad me had no clue how his life would proceed, or how lucky he would be. Sponsored by the library, of course. (Well, not of course, but…of course!)
Close to home, and at one of my favorite bookstores. ‘Nuff said.
Eastwood – (2820 Towne Center Blvd., Lansing, MI 48912)
Remember Borders when it was indie and great? (If so, you’re probably older and from Ann Arbor, like me. Sorry.) Anyway, Schuler is what it would have evolved into if it had stayed indie and gotten even better. I really like this store, and Whitney hosts great events.
This isn’t open to the general public, but if you’re an ABA member, a librarian, or an educator I’ll see you there! Where?Thursday, 3-4pm: Signing at the Abrams booth
Friday, 10-11am: Signing at the Abrams booth
Bonus: I’m doing an interview with “Authors’ Voice” at 12:30pm on Thursday, and you can take part. You can also advance order a signed copy through them, at //authorsvoice.net/shop/.
It’s been a couple years since I’ve been to TCAF, one of my favorite (favourite!) shows in the world, ever. I can’t wait to return. I’ll give a couple of talks, and sign some books, and then wander around in awe. I really do love this show.Saturday, 1-2pm: Panel w/Natalie Andrewson (Hinton Theater, Toronto Reference Library) on “Improving Yourself”
Saturday, 2-3pm: Signing areaSunday, 2:30-3:45: Nonfiction workshop (Writer’s Room, Toronto Reference Library)
Sunday, 3:45-4:45: Signing areaI’ll have some other signing times to share soon, I hope!
The home field advantage might mean I sound smarter than usual. I’m not sure of the format, but it might be a presentation, and it might be a straight Q&A with one of my librarian colleagues.
I’ll give a workshop on non-fiction comics at the NZ (1-2pm) and then take part in the Book Crawl at the Vault at 3pm (just crawl in, I think!). See you there!
No schedule yet, but I’ll be there, talking and signing. Unless that conflicts with going to see/hear/bow before Margaret Atwood, who will also be there. In that case you’ll meet my understudy or body double or something. (Okay, not really. I’m a pro, I can comport myself as such.) (I hope.)